Rosetta Stone Korean Review

Outline: Rosetta Stone Korean Reviews

• How The Rosetta Stone Korean Course Is Organized
• Rosetta Stone Korean Learning Method
• Rosetta Stone Korean Cost
• Strengths Of The Rosetta Stone Korean Program
• Weaknesses Of The Rosetta Stone Korean Program
• Verdict: Is Rosetta Stone Good For Learning Korean?

To help make navigating this detailed review a little easier, we have included jump-to links above for your convenience.

Video Review: Rosetta Stone Korean Program

In the video above, John from the Test Prep Insight team covers the pros and cons of using Rosetta Stone to learn Korean. For more detail, be sure to continue reading our full analysis below.

How The Rosetta Stone Korean Course Is Organized

Before diving into the pros and cons, let’s first explore how the Rosetta Stone Korean program is structured. When you sign up for Rosetta Stone, you’ll answer questions about your baseline fluency level, why you want to learn Korean, how much time you can dedicate daily, and more.

Based on your answers to these prompts, Rosetta Stone will create a weekly study plan for you. Although the plan is semi-personalized, the Korean course primarily comprises 12 different learning units covering topics such as travel, shopping, and health.

Each unit contains four lessons, and within each lesson, there are various sections to complete, including pronunciation, vocabulary, listening, and reading. In summary, the program consists of overarching units, each with four lessons, and each lesson containing multiple sections.

Rosetta Stone Korean Learning Method

Regarding the individual sections, they typically range from 5 to 30 minutes each. They all feature similar drills and exercises centered around images. I’ll delve deeper into the advantages and potential drawbacks of Rosetta Stone’s lesson format later, but for now, note that completing all the sections in a Rosetta Stone lesson usually takes about 50 to 60 minutes in total.

It’s also worth mentioning that unlike many other language learning apps, Rosetta Stone’s Korean program emphasizes immersion. This means there’s minimal use of English in lessons, and there’s no moderator or host to guide you.

Instead, Rosetta Stone believes that most communication should occur in your target language—in this case, Korean—to naturally develop comprehension through context and reasoning.

Rosetta Stone Korean Cost

Rosetta Stone’s subscription plans are quite affordable compared to other language learning options. They offer three plans: two monthly subscription options and one lifetime package. The monthly subscriptions range from $10 to $15 per month, while the lifetime option costs around $400 and includes access to all Rosetta Stone languages, not just Korean.

However, these prices are often discounted through sales and special promotions that occur almost year-round. Typically, you can expect discounts of at least 40%, if not more.

After discounts, the monthly subscriptions usually go for around $8 to $12, and the lifetime package can drop below $200, making Rosetta Stone more affordable than Pimsleur and Rocket Languages. Also, it’s worth noting that Rosetta Stone offers a free three day trial period as well.

Strengths Of The Rosetta Stone Korean Program

Now that we’ve discussed pricing, and how the Rosetta Stone Korean program generally works, let’s discuss the advantages of using this app to learn Korean.

Good Match For Visual Learners

The top reason why Rosetta Stone stands out is its suitability for visual learners. As mentioned previously, nearly every drill and exercise in the lessons incorporates images or graphics.

In fact, it’s the most visually-oriented language program our team has come across. If you learn best through visual methods and don’t rely heavily on auditory or kinesthetic learning, Rosetta Stone is likely to align perfectly with your learning style.

Immersive Learning Environment

As I mentioned earlier, I strongly endorse the immersive learning approach of the Rosetta Stone Korean program. While it may initially be challenging and even a bit frustrating, I believe that full language immersion ultimately accelerates learning compared to being fed information in English and expected to memorize it.

Consider how toddlers learn their native language; they do so gradually and naturally, absorbing information from a fully immersive environment. Our brains are naturally adept at recognizing patterns, identifying clues, and extracting meaning from context, which aligns perfectly with the Rosetta Stone curriculum.

So, despite its potential initial annoyances, particularly for beginners, I must commend Rosetta Stone for a learning method that I believe becomes increasingly effective over time.

Short Stories

Let’s explore the third advantage: the additional resources that Rosetta Stone provides to learners alongside their standard curriculum. Among these resources, my favorite has to be the short stories.

Here’s how it works: you listen as a Korean narrator reads a story to you, akin to a parent reading to a child before bedtime. Afterward, you can practice by reading the story aloud yourself, honing your pronunciation skills. It’s quite engaging and effective.

In essence, I find these stories to be an excellent tool for enhancing both your receptive (reading and listening) and expressive language skills (speaking).

Excellent Speech Tool

Lastly, I’d like to highlight Rosetta Stone’s TruAccent technology. This is the company’s speech recognition software that has undergone years of development and improvement.

As you engage in verbal practice exercises throughout the lessons, Rosetta’s speech technology provides immediate feedback on your pronunciation.

Having tested well over a dozen language apps and their speech tools, I must say that Rosetta Stone’s TruAccent speech technology ranks near the top. It seamlessly integrates into lessons, is user-friendly, quick, and, in my experience, fairly accurate—something I can’t always say for other speech software used by different language learning companies.

Overall, Rosetta Stone earns high praise for its pronunciation development and feedback capabilities.

Weaknesses Of The Rosetta Stone Korean Program

Now that we’ve covered the positives around Rosetta Stone, it’s only fair we highlight the negatives as well.

Dull Lesson Format

The Rosetta Stone lessons can become somewhat repetitive and monotonous. As mentioned several times, the drills primarily rely on the same picture-based format repeatedly.

Unlike programs like Pimsleur or Babbel, Rosetta Stone lacks the variety and diversity that can help maintain engagement. Therefore, if you’re someone who struggles to stay focused or tends to get bored easily, Rosetta Stone may not be the ideal choice for you.

However, it’s worth noting that you can break up the standard lessons by incorporating the short stories mentioned earlier, which can help alleviate some of the monotony.

Lack Of Direct Grammar Instruction

Rosetta Stone takes a unique approach by not offering explicit grammar explanations or instruction. Instead, they believe in teaching grammar intuitively, aligning with their immersive learning method.

Unlike other apps, you won’t be tasked with memorizing Korean grammar structures upfront. This approach may not suit everyone, as some prefer straightforward, concise grammar rules and tables for quicker comprehension.

Rosetta Stone opts for immersion, exposing you to the Korean language until you naturally begin to recognize grammatical markers. Whether this approach is a pro or con depends on where you stand on the grammar teaching spectrum.

Basic Speaking Drills

Lastly, I have a minor gripe with Rosetta Stone’s verbal practice exercises. While I appreciate the company’s TruAccent speech software, I feel that the exercises themselves could be more thorough and contextual.

Currently, they are quite basic, mainly focusing on listening and repeating words and phrases independently. While this is excellent for improving pronunciation, it doesn’t offer much in terms of practicing spontaneous, conversational language use.

I believe it would be beneficial to incorporate more opportunities for learners to think on their feet and use the language under pressure, similar to what other programs like Pimsleur Korean and Rocket Korean offer with their simulated mock conversations. This type of practice could help learners start holding basic conversations much sooner.

Verdict: Is Rosetta Stone Good For Learning Korean?

Having used the program, I believe the answer is largely yes. The affordability of Rosetta Stone’s subscription options is a positive aspect, and I appreciate the company’s immersive, image-based approach to learning, which is particularly suitable for visual learners. Additionally, the access to engaging short stories is a valuable resource.

The only scenarios where I might suggest looking elsewhere are if you’re an auditory or experiential learner, or if you’re seeking more advanced, conversation-based verbal practice. In such cases, I’d recommend considering Rocket Korean or Pimsleur.

However, overall, I believe Rosetta Stone is an excellent choice for learning Korean.

➡️Read Next: Rosetta Stone vs Duolingo